
China’s state planner has said the government has never required domestic technology companies to reject foreign investment, seeking to clarify its position as scrutiny intensifies around capital flows into strategically sensitive sectors. The statement came in response to questions over whether Chinese firms could be asked to refuse US funding.
Li Chao, spokesperson for the National Development and Reform Commission, said Chinese technology companies had not been instructed to avoid foreign capital. However, he added that overseas investment must comply with Chinese law and must not harm national security or national interests. That qualification keeps the door open to foreign participation, while reinforcing Beijing’s authority to intervene where technology, ownership or strategic risk is involved.
The clarification follows reports that regulators had told several private technology companies, including leading artificial intelligence start-ups, to reject US investment in funding rounds unless explicit approval was granted. The denial therefore matters less as a broad invitation to capital than as an attempt to define the boundaries of acceptable participation in a more security-conscious investment climate.
The issue has sharpened since Chinese authorities ordered Meta to unwind its acquisition of Manus, a domestic artificial intelligence start-up. That decision unsettled parts of the start-up and foreign business communities, highlighting the extent to which AI investment is now being assessed through both commercial and national-security lenses.
The unresolved question is how predictable China’s investment environment can remain for foreign capital in sensitive technologies. Beijing is signalling that foreign investment is not formally unwelcome, but its national-security caveat gives regulators considerable discretion. For investors, the practical challenge is no longer simply market access, but understanding where commercial opportunity ends and strategic sensitivity begins.